data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e42e9/e42e90d5a975db75cef0b4743f884faf39e2ba67" alt="Person's name and title"
By Trisha Sirju ,
Vice President, Senior Risk Consultant, Marsh Advisory
02/24/2025 · 5 minute read
The automotive industry in Canada is facing a growing concern regarding re-vinned vehicles — those with altered or replaced vehicle identification numbers (VINs). These vehicles are often linked to criminal activities such as theft and fraud, posing significant risks to dealerships. This article outlines the elevated risks associated with re-vinned vehicles, best practices for dealerships, and relevant sources for further information.
Canada is currently experiencing a surge in vehicle theft, with Ontario being hit the hardest. Frequently, these stolen vehicles are given a new VIN to prevent them from being flagged in stolen vehicle databases. They are then sold back into the market under new identities, which may be completely fabricated or belong to another vehicle.
In Canada, the obligation for dealerships to compensate customers for stolen vehicles can arise from several legal and regulatory frameworks, as well as consumer protection laws. Below, we highlight some key points specific to Canada:
Each province has its own consumer protection legislation that may require dealerships to provide certain guarantees regarding the vehicles they sell. If a vehicle is stolen, these laws may compel the dealership to compensate the customer for the stolen vehicle, especially if it was sold with a warranty.
Under various provincial Sale of Goods Acts, goods sold must be as described and free from defects. If a vehicle is stolen and the dealership did not disclose any issues related to the title or ownership, it may be held liable to compensate the customer for the cost of the vehicle.
If a dealership sells a vehicle that has a problematic title, for instance, it was stolen and not properly reported, it may be legally obligated to compensate the customer for the cost of the vehicle once the theft is discovered.
Dealerships that are part of a franchise may have contractual obligations to compensate customers for the cost of vehicles under certain circumstances, including theft.
Some dealerships may have insurance coverage that addresses losses from stolen vehicles, which can influence their decision to compensate customers for the cost of the vehicle.
To maintain customer trust and protect their reputation, dealerships may choose to compensate customers for the cost of stolen vehicles, even if not legally required.
In some provinces, regulatory bodies oversee automotive sales and may impose penalties or require compensation if dealerships fail to comply with consumer protection laws.
Mitigating risks associated with unwittingly purchasing and reselling re-vinned vehicles is crucial for Canadian dealerships. Below are some best practices that dealerships should consider:
The heightened risk of re-vinned vehicles presents significant challenges for dealerships in Canada. By implementing these best practices, dealerships can help protect themselves from legal liabilities, maintain their reputation, and ensure customer trust. By staying vigilant and proactive, dealerships can navigate this challenging landscape and continue to provide safe and reliable vehicles to their customers.