Skip to main content
Marsh logo

Article

PFAS Alarms Call on Manufacturers to Take Action

04/23/2019 · 2 minute read

Ubiquitous for decades in manufacturing, consumer goods, and more, so-called forever chemicals could start costing organizations millions of dollars now that regulators are watching them closely.

Last month, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection issued a directive requiring five chemical manufacturers to detail their use and discharge of harmful per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The state’s attorney general promptly followed up with natural resource damage assessments against four of those companies alleging that their use of PFAS and other substances contaminated groundwater, surface water, and other natural resources. And with regulators across the country raising concerns about forever chemicals, it’s only a matter of time before other states take potentially costly action of their own.

Growing Regulatory Scrutiny

PFAS — known as forever chemicals because of their complex, difficult-to-break chemical compositions — have useful applications across several industries. They have also been linked to health problems, including hypertension and cancer.

Two substances — perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) — have drawn particular attention from regulators in recent years. In 2016, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommended that PFOA and PFOS not exceed 70 parts per trillion in drinking water. In February 2019, the agency announced an action plan intended “to address PFAS and to protect public health.”

States are also watching closely. In 2017, New Jersey established a standard for PFOA in drinking water of 14 parts per trillion. Ten other states, meanwhile, have passed or considered bills intended to monitor or counteract the effects of PFAS.

Managing Risk

Amid increased regulatory oversight, and facing the potential of costly court proceedings and fines, manufacturers that create or use PFAS should take steps to manage their risk. Among other actions, you should seek to:

  • Assess your exposure. Identify which of your plants produce or use PFAS. Because you could be liable for past actions involving your facilities, also take a close look at plants that may have been involved in PFAS production or use before you purchased them. Evaluate your waste stream and disposal practices to better understand your risk as a potentially responsible party at non-owned disposal sites. And ensure your suppliers are similarly aware of their potential exposure.
  • Commit to reducing PFAS emissions. Through the EPA’s PFOA Stewardship Program, several leading chemical manufacturers have agreed to voluntarily phase out long-chain PFAS. Other companies have separately committed to reducing or eliminating PFAS emissions over time. If you haven’t already done so, consider making a similar commitment, which can help reduce your liability and improve your standing with regulators.
  • Consider insurance. Costs stemming from cleanup and remediation orders, jury verdicts, and settlements may be covered under environmental and casualty insurance, but are sometimes specifically excluded by policies. Work with your insurance advisors to transfer these exposures, where possible, and understand the extent of your coverage.

Their strong chemical makeup means that PFAS could represent a weak point in chemical companies’ risk profiles. As government actions ramp up, now is the time to understand, minimize, and potentially transfer your PFAS exposures.

Related insights

Placeholder Image

Article

5 major risks chemical companies should address now

07/14/2022
Placeholder Image

Video

Chemical and Life Sciences Risk Issue Series

06/22/2021
medical factory supplies storage indoor with workers people

Article

As Hurricane Season Approaches, Chemical Companies Should Consider Parametric Coverage

04/28/2021
A brightly lit petrochemical refinery against dramatic clouds

Article

Generally Soft Insurance Market for Chemical Companies Expected to Continue in 2016

02/23/2016
View more