Insurance costs allocated to the target by the seller may have been subsidized or inaccurate. Additionally, when the target looks to procure insurance on a standalone basis, any purchasing power of the seller group may be lost unless the buyer is a similarly sized organization. As a consequence, the target could face higher premiums post-close, which may not align with current cost allocations.
Depending on the position agreed in the sale and purchase agreement (SPA), the target may also need to explore retrospective insurance to cover assumed historical liabilities (see below). This coverage may have a significant one-off cost, or may further increase the target’s ongoing annual insurance costs — if the cover is available at all.
Lastly, for certain asset-heavy industries — such as manufacturing — property insurers may apply increased scrutiny to the condition of the target’s physical assets once they are no longer part of a larger seller portfolio. This may lead to insurers imposing ‘risk improvement requirements’, which the target would be required to complete before full cover is granted. Some requirements — for example, the fitting of a fire suppression system — may require significant capital expenditure.