Raj Rana
Head of Terrorism and Political Violence, Bowring Marsh
-
United Kingdom
The Russia-Ukraine war, the flare up of tensions between Israel and Hamas, and recent global civil unrest have led to greater awareness of the associated risks, leading to significant shifts in the political violence* insurance marketplace. Rates are rising, limits are increasingly challenged, terms and conditions are being reviewed, and in some territories — including Russia, Ukraine, Moldova, Belarus, Israel, and Taiwan — sanction and treaty restrictions mean insurers are now unable or reluctant to offer cover.
* Political violence means strikes, riots, and civil commotion (SRCC); war; malicious damage; mutiny; insurrection; revolution and rebellion; coup d’état; and terrorism and sabotage.
The Palestinian militant group Hamas launched an unprecedented terror attack on Israel beginning on October 7, 2023, with its fighters entering communities near the Gaza Strip, killing and severely wounding civilians and military personnel, and taking dozens of hostages. This is a developing situation that will be carefully watched for impacts on the political violence and political risk market
Insurers were still writing policies in Ukraine a week before Russia’s invasion, highlighting the difficulty of foreseeing the risk of political violence. Recent political violence events globally — in many cases, taking place against a backdrop of global and socio-economic uncertainty — have been equally unpredictable, including:
Note: As of November 3, 2023, the following are countries under sanctions: Afghanistan, Belarus, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, Syria, Russia-controlled regions in Ukraine, and Venezuela.
The Institute for Economics and Peace’s 2023 Global Peace Index reported a year-on-year deterioration in the average level of global peacefulness of 0.42%, with the largest regional deterioration in peacefulness in Russia and the Eurasia region. The global economic impact of violence was estimated at US$17.5 trillion in 2022 — up from US$16.5 trillion in 2021 — equivalent to 12.9% of global gross domestic product (GDP).
Global stability is predicted to continue to deteriorate. The World Bank estimates that by 2030 up to two-thirds of the world's extreme poor could live in fragility, conflict, and violence (FCV) settings.
The ripple effect of the Russia-Ukraine war on supply chains, food supplies, and energy costs, as well as the political and socio-economic protests that have taken place globally, highlight the disruption and economic impact political violence events can cause. Organisations have faced significant disruption to business and increased costs for security and preventative measures.
It’s important when purchasing insurance to secure the most suitable coverage for your organisation’s footprint and evaluate if policies, such as active assailant coverage and non-damage business interruption, are needed. It is also important to know when a coverage such as political violence insurance may best suit your needs, or when policies that wrap around existing coverage and government programs may be most effective.
Taking these steps — and working with advisors to build the right insurance program — will help you be more prepared to respond to future events.
For more information, contact:
Head of Terrorism and Political Violence, Bowring Marsh
United Kingdom
Terrorism Placement Advisory Leader, Property Practice, Marsh
United States