Article

The importance of selecting credible over generic flammability test data

Understand why credible flammability testing data is crucial for safety. Discover the risks of using generic data and how to ensure accurate assessments.

Flammability testing plays a crucial role in assessing the risks posed by fires and explosions from various substances. To obtain accurate and reliable flammability test data, it is essential to use information from credible sources. Relying on generic data available in the public domain can potentially lead to inaccurate results and introduce significant risks, threatening the safety of both employees and facilities.

Appropriate flammability test data

Flammability test data provides critical insights into the ignition sensitivity, explosion severity, reactivity, thermal stability, and electrostatic characteristics of flammable substances. Safety professionals can use this information to understand the potential hazards of manufacturing, storing, and handling flammable and dangerous substances.

To formulate a Basis of Safety, the data used should be both material-specific and representative in terms of physical form and chemical structure. Data should be obtained using calibrated test apparatus that has been designed in accordance with the relevant standards. It is also important to understand which test methodologies have been used, as this can significantly affect results.

Risks associated with using generic data

Generic data may appear cost-effective, convenient, and readily available, but it is unlikely to provide specific information on the substance in question, thus presenting significant risks if used to formulate a Basis of Safety.

Generic data lacks specificity, making it challenging to accurately assess the risks associated with a particular material or substance. Without precise data, safety professionals may underestimate the potential hazards, which could lead to inadequate safety measures and increase the likelihood of accidents.

Reliably sourcing test data

Physical testing is the most reliable way to ensure data is accurate, reliable, and representative. However, physical testing brings many variables that must be considered. For example, regarding combustible dust testing, this can include particle size, particle shape, and moisture content.

To ensure the integrity and traceability of data collected, professionals should seek accredited laboratories and testing facilities which follow standardised procedures and adhere to strict quality control guidelines.

Furthermore, regulatory bodies often require specific flammability test data for compliance purposes, and generic data may not meet these requirements. This could expose organisations to possible legal consequences, potential liabilities, and inadequate insurance.

Developing an approach centred on accurate testing data enables organisations to make informed decisions when establishing a robust Basis of Safety — sufficiently protecting employees and facilities from the hazards associated with fires and explosions.

For further assistance and discussion on interpreting and the suitability of test data, reach out to your usual Marsh contact.

Heating plant technician standing by gas pipes and maintaining temperature inside power plant boiler room.

Article

The importance of selecting credible over generic flammability test data

Appropriate flammability test data

Risks associated with using generic data

Reliably sourcing test data

Related insights

Jargon buster: Flammable gas and vapour testing

Jargon buster – combustible dust testing

Letters of Credit: Challenges to insurer collateral requirements

Managing risk in a volatile business environment: The role of integrated risk quantification

Related insights

Jargon buster: Flammable gas and vapour testing

Jargon buster – combustible dust testing

Letters of Credit: Challenges to insurer collateral requirements

Managing risk in a volatile business environment: The role of integrated risk quantification

Marsh.com Sign in

The importance of selecting credible over generic flammability test data

Appropriate flammability test data

Risks associated with using generic data

Reliably sourcing test data

Related insights

Jargon buster: Flammable gas and vapour testing

Jargon buster – combustible dust testing

Letters of Credit: Challenges to insurer collateral requirements

Managing risk in a volatile business environment: The role of integrated risk quantification

Related insights

Jargon buster: Flammable gas and vapour testing

Jargon buster – combustible dust testing

Letters of Credit: Challenges to insurer collateral requirements

Managing risk in a volatile business environment: The role of integrated risk quantification