Hugh Waggett
UK Enterprise Risk Practice Leader (SVP)
-
United Kingdom
Despite best efforts, unsafe products can circumvent quality management controls and enter the marketplace. The process of retrieving dangerous or non-compliant goods is labelled a recall.
Recalls present a real threat to organisations through: loss of sales, erosion of customer confidence, or damage to public health. However, a well-handled recall can reduce the negative impacts of an incident and could potentially improve the reputation of organisations through demonstration of honesty and integrity.
While recall plans must be specific to the relevant organization’s activities, all appropriate recall plans will sufficiently cover three key objectives. Organizations should seek to - at a minimum - prevent further sale of specific product, inform both the customers and appropriate authorities, and conduct a proper removal of product from the marketplace.
Higher management should consistently be attempting to demonstrate commitment to supporting and developing the Product Recall Framework.
Activities to consider:
Taking action to address risks and opportunities beforehand is crucial to creating a robust response to potential product recall incidents, should they occur.
Activities to consider:
Finding the essential resources required for the establishment, maintenance, and continual improvement of the Product Recall Framework.
Activities to consider:
Identifying improvement areas and implementing compulsory actions to meet Product Recall Framework necessities where required.
Activities to consider:
There are four common issues that periodically impede organisations dealing with product recalls. Process and governance, information management, stakeholder management, and resourcing are topics that all parties would benefit from regularly discussing.
Roles and responsibilities for addressing product quality - including the decision to action recalls - should be both structured and suitably adaptable to handle complex situations as they arise. Common weaknesses include: poor clarity of crisis response duties, inefficient cross-functional cooperation, missed opportunity, and delays to decision-making. This can make an organisation appear apathetic to both affected customers and the media.
Traceability of affected products, along with the locating of relevant technical and procedural documentation, needs to occur quickly. Reliable recording of key decisions, tracking performance, and cost metrics are also essential for businesses to understand the financial cost of a recall event. Poor performance can result in failure to properly satisfy regulators and shareholders that all affected product is located and accounted for. Difficulty in managing costs or scope of remediation efforts can make loss recovery from insurers complicated.
Transparent and consistent communication, internally and externally, is vital to ensuring effective mitigating control for reputational damage. The perception of dishonesty and inconsistency within organisations can undermine stakeholder confidence. This can potentially exacerbate a crisis beyond the original product issue.
Upon discovery of a fault, it is essential resources are mobilized rapidly to categorize the cause and scope of the issue. This facilitates a swift design and implementation of a technical solution. Identification and engagement of knowledgeable experts - with relevant experience - in short timeframes can also enhance effectiveness of responses. However, increasing customer-facing resources to meet the inevitable surge in demand can pose difficulties and therefore should be planned in advance.
For more information please contact Marsh Advisory.
UK Enterprise Risk Practice Leader (SVP)
United Kingdom
Advisory Quality and Recall Consultant, Marsh Advisory