Ellen Charnley
President, Marsh Captive Solutions
-
United States
Recognising that a wide array of internal and external stakeholders are basing their decisions on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, Marsh launched its ESG Risk Rating in March 2022. It is a complimentary self-assessment that enables clients to measure their organisation’s ESG performance, understand their ESG risk profiles, and gain access to risk and insurance benefits.
As more companies use the tool, the trends and correlations from the insights given are becoming more evident. We are finding potentially significant relationships in the data relevant to the management and mitigation of risk. For example, in October 2022, we were able to show that organisations with stronger social performance experience better claims performance for workers’ compensation. Now, we are seeing early signs of a positive correlation between companies with captives and their ESG rating – and here we take a deeper dive into this finding.
Many leaders are exploring alternative strategies to finance their risk to counter the higher insurance rates, lack of capacity, and more stringent carrier terms and conditions they are experiencing. One of the most popular is through a captive insurance company.
When we started our analysis our expectation was that companies with captives would have higher ESG scores as they tend to be more proactive in their risk management. We expected this to especially be the case for the ‘G’ component.
Our analysis was based on data from over 100 large companies, being those with a revenue of US$1 billion or more. Our results did find a correlation: Companies with captives had higher average ESG Risk Rating scores than those without. However, we were surprised that the strongest statistical significance was found in the ‘S’ component, specifically within the themes of clients and customers, and employment and wealth generation.
Our findings are outlined below in more detail.
Note: The Marsh ESG Risk Rating has 19 key themes, tied closely to the World Economic Forum framework for sustainability, Measuring Stakeholder Capitalism (WEF, 2020).
Captive owners are more likely to have stronger credentials than non-captive owners when it comes to the social dimension of ESG.
Captive owners are more likely to meet the criteria of people-related sustainability standards, such as the following:
This is likely due to captive owners typically having greater collaboration and harmonisation between risk management and human resources (HR), as people-related risks are self-insured via their captive.
With regard to employment and wealth generation, captive owners are more likely to have practices in place to control, monitor, and report employee remuneration and turnover by diversity metrics, and be more inclusive in their recruitment practices.
Captive owners are more likely to regularly assess their clients’ and customers’ portfolios against ESG criteria, and to have policies and procedures in place to protect customer data privacy.
Captive owners are more likely to score higher on questions pertaining to their highest governance body construct, and incorporation of ESG issues into it.
Companies with captives are in a good position to showcase how their existing processes and protocols feed into their ESG risk mitigation and management. Our ESG Risk Rating tool has been valuable for helping our clients to confidentially assess their ESG profile against international best practices and communicate this to their stakeholders.
Through insight garnered from our rating tool, we have found that ESG performance and risk appear to be intrinsically linked across many different dimensions. The ESG Risk Rating self-assessment is providing the missing link to enable the discovery of correlations and analysis of trends. This allows clients to robustly differentiate themselves in an increasingly complex risk landscape.
[1] Our correlation analyses include testing for variance and normal distribution, and then p-value non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney) to arrive at ESG dimensions with >95% confidence of statistical significance in correlation.
To know more speak to our Captive teams.
President, Marsh Captive Solutions
United States
Risk Management Leader, Europe
Ireland
Americas Sales and Consulting Leader, Marsh Captive Solutions
United States